KRITIKA DIJAGNOZE POREMEĆAJA LIČNOSTI U AKTUELNIM KLASIFIKACIJAMA: PERSPEKTIVA SOCIJALNOG KONSTRUKTIVIZMA

Главни садржај чланка

Milica M Lazic

Сажетак

Osnovni cilj ovog preglednog rada je da ponudi alternativnu perspektivu razumevanja problema u funkcionisanju, koji su u aktuelnim klasifikacijama imenovani kao poremećaji ličnosti. Kroz pristup socijalnog konstruktivizma, kao i koz kritiku postojećih klasifikacionih sistema u konceptualnom i metodološkom smislu, ponuđen je predlog za promenu shvatanja dijagnoze poremećaja ličnosti. Pregledom istraživanja je stavljen akcenat na to da definisanje, određenje i prevalenca normalnosti u domenu ličnosti, zavisi kako od kulture u kojoj se normalnost definiše, tako i od usaglašenosti između osobina ličnosti određene osobe i kulture u kojoj je odrasla ili u koju je migrirala. Ponuđeni pregled istraživanja vodi autore u pravcu toga da predlože preispitivanje shvatanja i definisanja poremećaja ličnosti kao problema adaptacije. Ovaj termin naglašava potrebu za razumevanjem šireg aspekta faktora nastanka, razvoja i održavanja problema, ali i nudi mnogo alternativnih načina u razumevanju pristupa problemima adaptacije. Pored konceptualnih problema, u radu su diskutovani i metodološki problemi aktuelnih klasifikacija koji ukazuju na to da su one nepouzdane, nevalidne i da ne ispunjavaju kriterijume dobrog klasifikovanja.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Детаљи чланка

Како цитирати
Lazic, M. M. KRITIKA DIJAGNOZE POREMEĆAJA LIČNOSTI U AKTUELNIM KLASIFIKACIJAMA: PERSPEKTIVA SOCIJALNOG KONSTRUKTIVIZMA. Годишњак Филозофског факултета у Новом Саду, 44(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2019.1.115-129
Bрој часописа
Секција
Психологија

Референце

Alarcón, R. D., Foulks, E. F., & Vakkur, M. (1998). Personality disorders and culture: Clinical and conceptual interactions. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Ascoli, M., Lee, T., Warfa, N., Mairura, J., Persaud, A., & Bhui, K. (2011). Race, culture, ethnicity and personality disorder: Group Careif position paper. World Cultural Psychiatry Research Review, 6(1), 52-60.
Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York, NY: Regan Books.
Blais, M. A., McCann, J. T., Benedict, K. B., & Norman, D. K. (1997). Toward an empirical/theoretical grouping of the DSM-III-R personality disorders. Journal of personality disorders, 11(2), 191-198.
Caldwell-Harris, C. L., & Ayçiçegi, A. (2006). When personality and culture clash: The psychological distress of allocentrics in an individualist culture and idiocentrics in a collectivist culture. Transcultural psychiatry, 43(3), 331-361.
Dimitrijević, A. (2009). Multiphrenia chronic (in obs), Psihijatrija danas, 41, 65-79.
Divac Jovanović, M., & Švrakić, D. (2016). Granična ličnost i njena različita lica: šta su poremećaji ličnosti? Beograd: Clio.
Friedman, C. T., & Faguet, R. A. (Eds.) (1982). Extraordinary disorders of human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Hall, J. R., & Benning, S. D. (2006). The “successful” psychopath: Adaptive and subclinical manifestations of psychopathy in the general population. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 459–478). New York, NY: Guilford.
Hwu, H. G., Yeh, E. K., & Change, L. Y. (1989). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in Taiwan defined by the Chinese Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 79, 136–147.
Ishikawa, S. S., Raine, A., Lencz, T., Bihrle, S., & Lacasse, L. (2001). Autonomic stress reactivity and executive functions in successful and unsuccessful criminal psychopaths from the community. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 423–432.
Jansen, L. (2009). Classifications. Applied Ontology: An Introduction, 159-172.
Kim, Y. R., & Tyrer, P. (2010). Controversies surrounding classification of personality disorder. Psychiatry investigation, 7(1), 1-8.
Kleinman, A., & Good, B. (Eds.) (1985). Culture and depression. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual review of clinical psychology, 10(1), 477-501.
Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., Kessler, R. C. (2007). DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological Psychiatry, 62(6), 553-564
Livesley, W. J. (1998). Suggestions for a framework for an empirically based classification of personality disorder. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43(2), 137-147.
Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2007). Using a general model of personality to identify the basic elements of psychopathy. Journal of personality disorders, 21(2), 160-178.
Martinez-Taboas, A. (1991). Multiple personality disorder as seen from a social constructionist viewpoint. Dissociation: Progress in the Dissociative Disorders, 4(3), 129-133.
Millon, T., Millon, C. M., Meagher, S., Grossman, S., & Ramnath, R. (2012). Personality disorders in modern life. Hoboken, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Moldin, S. O., Rice, J. P., Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L., & Squires-Wheeler, E. (1994). Latent structure of DSM-III—R Axis II psychopathology in a normal sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(2), 259-266.
Mullins-Nelson, J. L., Salekin, R. T., & Leistico, A. M. R. (2006). Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: Implications for the successful psychopathy concept. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5(2), 133-149.
Patrick, J. (2006). Handbook of psychopathy. New York: The Guilford Press.
Paris, J. (1996). Social factors in the personality disorders: A biopsychosocial approach to etiology and treatment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paris, J. (1996). Cultural factors in the emergence of borderline pathology. Psychiatry, 59, 185–192.
Paris, J. (1999). A diathesis-stress model of personality disorders. Psychiatric Annals, 29, 692-697.
Paris, J. (2007). The nature of borderline personality disorder: multiple dimensions, multiple symptoms, but one category. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(5), 457-473.
Paris, J., & Lis, E. (2012). Can sociocultural and historical mechanisms influence the development of borderline personality disorder?. Transcultural psychiatry, 50, 140-151.
Robins, L. N., & Regier, D. A. (Eds.) (1991). Psychiatric disorders in America. New York, NY: Free Press.
Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., & McGlashan, T. H. (2000). Factor analysis of the DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder criteria in psychiatric inpatients.American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(10), 1629-1633.
Sifferd, K. L., & Hirstein, W. (2013). On the criminal culpability of successful and unsuccessful psychopaths. Neuroethics, 6(1), 129-140.
Smith, R. J. (1999). Psychopathic behavior and issues of treatment. New Ideas in Psychology, 17, 165-176.
Svrakic, D. M., Draganic, S., Hill, K., Bayon, C., Przybeck, T. R., & Cloninger, C. R. (2002). Temperament, character, and personality disorders: etiologic, diagnostic, treatment issues. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 106(3), 189-195.
Svrakic, D. M., Whitehead, C., Przybeck, T. R., & Cloninger, C. R. (1993). Differential diagnosis of personality disorders by the seven-factor model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 991-999.
Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E., & Cramer, V. (2001). The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Archives of general psychiatry, 58(6), 590-596.
Verheul, R., & Widiger, T. A. (2004). A meta-analysis of the prevalence and usage of the personality disorder not otherwise specified (PDNOS) diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 309-319.
Wachs, T. D. (2000). Necessary but not sufficient: The respective roles of single and multiple influences on individual development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wakefield, J. C. (2008). The perils of dimensionalization: Challenges in distinguishing negative traits from personality disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31(3), 379-393.
Widiger, T. A., & Clark, L. A. (2000). Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology. Psychological bulletin, 126(6), 946-963.
Wright, A. G., Hallquist, M. N., Morse, J. Q., Scott, L. N., Stepp, S. D., Nolf, K. A., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2013). Clarifying interpersonal heterogeneity in borderline personality disorder using latent mixture modeling. Journal of personality disorders, 27(2), 125-143.
Zhong, J., & Leung, F. (2009). Diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in China: Current status and future directions. Current psychiatry reports, 11, 69-73