Modeli društvenih mreža kao posrednici između teorije i empirije Primer statističkih modela mrežne dinamike

Главни садржај чланка

Aleksandar S. Tomašević
Valentina Sokolovska

Сажетак

U radu se analiziraju mogućnosti upotrebe statističkih modela mrežne dinamike prilikom sociološke analize društvenih mreža. Tačnije, autori na osnovu definicija i specifikacija modela, kao i pregleda različitih primena ovih modela, žele da potvrde sledeću hipotezu: (matematički) modeli mreža u društvenim naukama ne predstavljaju ekstenziju teorije, odnosno nisu samo njena operacionalizacija, kao ni prosta generalizacija empirijskih podataka, već poseduju svojevrsnu autonomiju, koja je od suštinske važnosti za istraživački postupak. Stoga se nakon uvodnog dela, autori ukratko bave objašnjenjem pojma mrežne statike i mrežne dinamike, potom razvojem modela mrežne dinamike, kao i opravdavanjem statističkog (stohastičkog) modela i modela zasnovanog na akterima. Nakon toga, sledi pregled osnovnih pravaca savremenih istraživanja mreža u kojima se koriste modeli i na osnovu analize njihovih rezultata testira se osnovna hipoteza rada.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Детаљи чланка

Како цитирати
Tomašević, A. S., & Sokolovska, V. (2018). Modeli društvenih mreža kao posrednici između teorije i empirije: Primer statističkih modela mrežne dinamike. Годишњак Филозофског факултета у Новом Саду, 42(2), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2017.2.427-440
Bрој часописа
Секција
Социологија

Референце

Barabási, A. L. and R. Albert (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.

Bilinović, A. i V. Sokolovska (2016). Homofilija u socijalnim mrežama. Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke 2(155-156), 325-338.

Burk, W. J., M. Kerr and H. Stattin (2008). The co-evolution of early adolescent friendship networks, school involvement, and delinquent behaviors. Revue française de sociologie, 49(3), 499-522.

Coleman, J. S. and T. Fararo (Eds.) (1992.). Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique. New York: Sage Publications.

Doreian, P., V. Batagelj and A. Ferligoj (2005). Generalized Blockmodeling. Cambridge University Press.

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. London: The Guilford Press.

Kreps, D. M. (1990). Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kronegger, L., F. Mali, A. Ferligoj and P. Doreian (2012). Collaboration structures in Slovenian scientific communities. Scientometrics, 90(2), 631-647.

Lazega, E., C. Lemercier and U. Mounier (2006). A spinning top model of formal organization and informal behavior: Dynamics of advice networks among judges in a commercial court. European management review, 3(2), 113-122.

Mali, F., A. Ferligoj, and L. Kronegger (2010). Co-authorship trends and collaboration patterns in the Slovenian sociological community. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 1(2), 29-50.

McElreath, R. and R. Boyd (2007). Mathematical models of social evolution: A guide for the perplexed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Morgan, M. S. and M. Morrison, M. (Eds.) (1999). Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nadel, S. F. (1958). The Theory of Social Structure. The Free Press of Glencoe.

Newman, M. E. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical review E, 64(1), 016131.

Newman, M. E. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical review E, 64(1), 016132.

Newman, M. E. (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical review E, 69(6), 066133.

Newman, M. (2009). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative science quarterly, 296-320.

Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515.

Sokolovska Valentina, Tomašević Aleksandar, Dinić Bojana i Isidora Jarić (2016). Evolution of students' friendship networks: Examining the influence of group size. Etnoantropološki problemi 11(4), 1135-1151.

Van de Bunt, G. G., M. A. Van Duijn and T. A. Snijders (1999). Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5(2), 167-192.

Van de Bunt, G. G., R. P. Wittek and M.C. de Klepper (2005). The Evolution of IntraOrganizational Trust Networks The Case of a German Paper Factory: An Empirical Test of Six Trust Mechanisms. International sociology, 20(3), 339-369.

Van de Bunt, G. G. and P. Groenewegen (2007). An actor-oriented dynamic network approach the case of interorganizational network evolution. Organizational Research Methods, 10(3), 463- 482.

Van Duijn, M. A., E. P. Zeggelink, M. Huisman, F. N. Stokman, and F. W. Wasseur (2003). Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27(2-3), 153-191.

Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University press.

Watts, D. J. and S. H. Strogatz (1998). Collective dynamics of'small-world networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440-442.

Weil, A. (1949/1969). On the algebraic study of certain types of marriage laws (Murngin system). Appendix in: C. Lévi-Strauss. Elementary Structures of Kinship. Beacon Press, 221-230.

White, D. R. and F. Harary (2001). The cohesiveness of blocks in social networks: Node connectivity and conditional density. Sociological Methodology, 31(1), 305-359.