IMPLICATIONS OF THE DANISH DEFINITENESS ALTERNATION FOR CONCORD IN NANOSYNTAX
Главни садржај чланка
Сажетак
The Danish definiteness alternation presents two challenges for Nanosyntax. First, it displays structural allomorphy of the definiteness marker between a suffix and prenominal article; second, there is concord between the definiteness marker and noun gender. I show that Nanosyntax can address both issues, explaining the suffix-article alternation by virtue of its spellout algorithm and the lexical overlap between suffix and article. This account provides a deeper explanation for the structural allomorphy than the Distributed Morphology analysis proposed by Hankamer & Mikkelsen (2018). The existing proposal for concord in Nanosyntax (Caha, 2019) cannot handle this combination of gender concord and allomorphy, so I propose a simple copying mechanism which handles concord more flexibly. This new proposal, however, is substantially less restrictive than Caha’s framework, paving the way for future work to balance restrictiveness with empirical coverage of prefix/suffix alternations and concord across languages.
Downloads
Metrics
Детаљи чланка
Референце
Baunaz, L., & Lander, E. (2018). Nanosyntax. In: L. Baunaz, L. Haegeman, K. De Clercq, & E. Lander (eds.), Exploring Nanosyntax. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190876746.001.0001
Caha, P. (2009). The Nanosyntax of case (PhD Thesis). Universitetet i Tromsø.
Caha, P. (2019). Case competition in Nanosyntax. A study of numeral phrases in Ossetic and Russian. LingBuzz. Available at https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004875
Caha, P. (2020). Modeling declensions without declension features. The case of Russian. Available at https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005537
Caha, P., De Clercq, K., & Vanden Wyngaerd, G. (2019). The fine structure of the comparative. Studia Linguistica, 73(3), 470–521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12107
Delsing, L.-O. (1993). The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian Languages (PhD Thesis). University of Lund.
Embick, D., & Marantz, A. (2008). Architecture and Blocking. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), 1–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.1
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: The view from building 20. The MIT Press. 111–176.
Hankamer, J., & Mikkelsen, L. (2005). When movement must be blocked: A reply to Embick and Noyer. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 85–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993664
Hankamer, J., & Mikkelsen, L. (2018). Structure, Architecture, and Blocking. Linguistic Inquiry, 49(1), 61–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00266
Pesetsky, D. (2013). Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019729.001.0001
Starke, M. (2010). Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd, 36(1), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7557/12.213
Starke, M. (2018). Complex Left Branches, Spellout, and Prefixes. In: L. Baunaz, L. Haegeman, K. De Clercq, & E. Lander (Eds.), Exploring Nanosyntax. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190876746.003.0009
Taraldsen, K. T. (2010). The nanosyntax of Nguni noun class prefixes and concords. Lingua, 120(6), 1522–1548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.10.004
Taraldsen, K. T., Taraldsen Medová, L., & Langa, D. (2018). Class prefixes as specifiers in Southern Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 36(4), 1339–1394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9394-8