CLITIC CLIMBING WITH DIFFERENT KINDS OF DA-COMPLEMENTS IN SERBIAN AND THE STATUS OF PROBABILISTIC RULES IN GRAMMAR

Главни садржај чланка

Stefan Ivanović
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3636-6279
Predrag Kovačević
Nataša Milićević

Сажетак

This paper addresses the problem of clitic climbing out of different da-complements in Serbian. Clitic climbing refers to a phenomenon where a clitic associated with an embedded clause is pronounced in the matrix clause. In previous literature (Aljović, 2005; Progovac, 1993; Stjepanović, 2004, etc.), various, sometimes contradictory, claims have been made about the (un)grammaticality of clitic climbing out of da-complements in Serbian. This paper provides experimental data on the acceptability of clitic climbing out of different kinds of da-complements in Serbian. We tested the predictions from Todorović & Wurmbrand (2020) by conducting a formal acceptability judgment experiment involving clitic climbing out of Proposition, Situation and Event-type embedded clauses. Although the results seem to generally follow the Implicational Complementation Hierarchy, the transitions between clause types are rather gradual. Following Bošković’s (2004) proposal that clitics surface in the second position in their Intonational Phrase, we analyze the optionality of clitic climbing as being the result of a probabilistic rule at PF which decides whether da will induce a prosodic boundary, which takes structural size of the complement clause as one of its factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Детаљи чланка

Како цитирати
Ivanović, S., Kovačević, P., & Milićević, N. (2024). CLITIC CLIMBING WITH DIFFERENT KINDS OF DA-COMPLEMENTS IN SERBIAN AND THE STATUS OF PROBABILISTIC RULES IN GRAMMAR. Годишњак Филозофског факултета у Новом Саду, 48(3), 135–155. преузето од https://godisnjak.ff.uns.ac.rs/index.php/gff/article/view/2378
Секција
ELALT

Референце

Adger, D. (2006). Combinatorial variability. Journal of linguistics, 42(3), 503–530.

Adger, D., & Smith, J. (2010). Variation in agreement: A lexical feature-based approach. Lingua, 120(5), 1109–1134.

Aljović, N. (2005). On clitic climbing in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian. Lingvistički vidici, 34(5), 58–84.

Borer, H. (1984). Parametric Syntax. Foris.

Bošković, Ž. (2004). Clitic placement in south Slavic. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 12, 37–90.

Bresnan, J. (2007). Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S. Featherston & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base (pp. 75–96). Mouton de Gruyter.

Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, H. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Boume, I. Krämer, & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation (pp. 69–94). Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.

Bresnan, J., & Ford, M. (2010). Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language, 86(1), 168–213. http://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0189

Bresnan, J., & Hay, J. (2008). Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua, 118(2), 245–259. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.007

Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.

Cowart, W. (1997). Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Sage Publications.

Guy, G. R. (2014). Linking usage and grammar: Generative phonology, exemplar theory, and variable rules. Lingua, 142(SI: Usage-based and rule-based approaches to phonological variation), 57–65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.07.007

Goodall, G. (2021). Sentence acceptability experiments: What, how and why. In G. Goodall (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of experimental syntax (pp. 7–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569620.002

Kolaković, Z., Jurkiewicz-Rohrbacher, E., Hansen, B., Filipović Đurđević, D., & Fritz, N. (2022). Clitics in the wild: Empirical studies on the microvariation of the pronominal, reflexive and verbal clitics in Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. Language Science Press. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5792972

Milićev, T., & Jakovljević, B. (2017). Prosodic phrasing of da-clauses in Serbian. In V. Delić, N. Jakovljević, & M. Sečujski (Eds.), Proceedings of DOGS2017 (pp. 21-25). Faculty of Technical Sciences.

Progovac, L. (1993). Locality and subjunctive-like complements in Serbo-Croatian. Journal of Slavic linguistics, 1, 116–144.

Thoms, G., Adger, D., Heycock, C., & Smith, J. (2019). Syntactic variation and auxiliary contraction: The surprising case of Scots. Language, 95(3), 421–455.

Todorović, N., & Wurmbrand, S. (2020). Finiteness across domains. In T. Radeva-Bork & P. Kosta (Eds.), Current developments in Slavic linguistics. Twenty years after: Based on selected papers from FDSL 11. Peter Lang.

Wasow, T. (2007). Gradient data and gradient grammars. In M. Elliott, J. Kirby, O. Sawada, E. Staraki, & S. Yoon (Eds.), Proceedings from the Main Session of the Forty-third Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Volume 43-1 (pp. 255–271). Chicago Linguistic Society.

Wurmbrand, S., Kovač, I., Lohninger, M., Pajančič, C., & Todorović, N. (2020). Finiteness in South Slavic complement clauses: Evidence for an implicational finiteness universal. Linguistica, 60, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.60.1.119-137