THE IMPORTANCE OF CULTURAL COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL WORK

Main Article Content

Marko M. Škorić
Aleksej J. Kišjuhas
Jovana J. Škorić

Abstract

Social work studies and reinforces social interaction among people that affect their ability to achieve their aspirations and values. This is the reason why the concept of cultural competence is of great importance to the academic discipline and the profession of social work. Social work also demands an opposition to discrimination and repression of the social protection users, which is why it is crucial to recognize the minority, discriminated and marginalized individuals in a group and the community, and in a society or culture. In this sense, this paper is dedicated to the concept of cultural competence in the context of social work in a multicultural environment. Multicultur- alism is a political movement, ideology and/or socio-political practice that opposes monocultural- ism or normative cultural unity and cultural homogeneity. It is a civil and human right of cultural groups that is rooted in human dignity and the fundamental equality of different cultures (includ- ing the cultural differences regarding race, ethnicity, religion, skills and ability, gender, sexuality, economic and social status, etc.). In addition, the important idea of interculturalism implies cross- cultural dialogue and active learning rather than passive acceptance of multiculturalism as a simple plurality of mutually segregated and/or isolated cultures.

As an important concept for understanding the relationship between cultural competence and social work stands the concept of deep culture, as well as the idea of intercultural learning as a prerequisite of a culturally competent practice. Deep culture represents unconscious meanings, values, norms and hidden assumptions that allow interpretations of our experiences during inter- actions with other people. For these reasons, we problematize the key relevance of cultural com- petence in the contemporary context of more frequent cultural contacts, new social networks and communities, and the phenomenon of globalization.

Finally, we highlight the relevance of cultural competence as an ability to effectively interact with people of different cultures. It is claimed that the practice of social work in multicultural environments strongly depends on the understanding of different cultures which makes it necessary to develop cultural competence – to understand the differences in behavior, ways of thinking, assumptions and values in the culturally mixed environments. A large number of social problems and misunderstandings in interactions follows from the domain of implicit or deep culture, which has implications for a culturally competent social work.

Based on these findings, it is argued that cultural competence is comprised of services, support and other forms of assistance that are offered in a way that matches the beliefs, interpersonal communication styles, attitudes, language and behavior of service users. Thus, cultural competence is actually a competence in acquiring culturally relevant understandings of (cultural) minority problems that can be used in odred to provide culturally appropriate interventions in social work. We offer three levels of culturally competent practices: the level of practitioners, the level of or- ganization of social work and community level, with the micro, meso and macro dimensions of these practices. Therefore, it is necessary that, in the process of their education, social workers acquire a certain core of cultural/anthropological knowledge about humanity as a whole, and to be open to intercultural learning about the differences in customs, beliefs, value systems etc. of individuals and service users. In other words, culturally competent social worker must understand cross-cultural and sociopolitical dimensions of their own professional practice in a creative, criti- cal and morally autonomous way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Škorić, M. M., Kišjuhas, A. J., & Škorić, J. J. (2015). THE IMPORTANCE OF CULTURAL COMPETENCE FOR SOCIAL WORK. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, 40(2), 189–207. Retrieved from https://godisnjak.ff.uns.ac.rs/index.php/gff/article/view/1515
Section
Социологија

References

American Psychological Association (2003). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. American Psychologist, 58, 377-402.

American Psychological Association (2008). Report of the Task Force on the Implementation of the Multicultural Guidelines. Washington: Author.

Arasaratnam, L. A. & M. L. Doerfel (2005). Intercultural communication competence: Identifying key components from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 137-163.

Brockman, J. (1995). The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Brown, D. E. (1991). Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Collins, R. (1975). Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York: Academic Press.

Feng, A., M. Byram, & M. Fleming (eds) (2009). Becoming Interculturally Competent through Education and Training. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Ferguson, I., M. Lavalette, & E. Whitmore (eds) (2005). Globalisation, Global Justice and Social Work. London and New York: Routledge.

Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway World. London: Routledge.

Hall, E. T. (1959). The Silent Language. New York: Doubleday.

Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.

Henderson Metzger, L. L., L. I. Nadkarni, & J. A. Erickson Cornish (2010). An overview of multicultural counseling competencies. In: J. A. Erickson Cornish, B. A. Schreier, L. I. Nadkarni, L. Henderson Metzger, & E. R. Rodolfa (eds), Handbook of Multicultural Counseling Competencies (pp. 1-21). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Kastoryano, R. (ed.) (2009). An Identity for Europe: The Relevance of Multiculturalism in EU Construction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kearney, M. (1975). World view theory and study. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4, 247-270.

Kirk, S. A. & W. J. Reid (2002). Science and Social Work: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kirst-Ashman, K. K. (2008). Human Behavior, Communities, Organizations, and Groups in the Macro Social Environment: An Empowerment Approach, 2nd Edition. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

Kluckhohn, C. (1949). Mirror For Man: A Survey of Human Behavior and Social Attitudes. Greenwich: Fawcett Publications, Inc.

Kroeber, A. L. & C. Kluckhohn (1952). Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Cambridge: Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology 42 (1).

Laden, A. S. & D. Owen (eds) (2007). Multiculturalism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, C. C. (2013). The cross-cultural encounter: Meeting the challenge of culturally competent counseling. In: C. C. Lee (ed), Multicultural Issues in Counseling: New Approaches to Diversity, 4th Edition (pp. 13-19). Alexandria: Wiley.

Lee, C. C. & D. Park (2013). A conceptual framework for counseling across cultures. In: C. C. Lee (ed), Multicultural Issues in Counseling: New Approaches to Diversity, 4th Edition (pp. 3-12). Alexandria: Wiley.

Leeds-Hurwitz (2010). Writing the intellectual history of intercultural communication. In: T. K. Nakayama & R. T. Halualani (eds), The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication (pp. 21-33). Madden: Wiley-Blackwell.

Lorenz, W. (1998). Social work, social policies and minorities in Europe. In: C. H. Williams, H. Soydan, & M. R. D. Johnson (eds), Social Work and Minorities: European Perspectives (pp. 247-264). London and New York: Routledge.

Lum, D. (2011). Culturally Competent Practice: A Framework for Understanding Diverse Groups and Justice Issues, 4th Edition. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.

Magala, S. (2005). Cross-cultural Competence. London nad New York: Routledge.

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Meer, N. & T. Modood (2012). How does interculturalism contrast with multiculturalism? Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33, 175-196.

Moule, J. (2012). Cultural Competence: A Primer for Educators, Second Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth.

National Association of Social Workers (2001). NASW Standards for Cultural Competence in Social Work Practice. Washington: Author.

National Multicultural Advisory Council (1999). Australian Multiculturalism for a New Century: Towards Inclusiveness. Canberra: NMAC.

National Association of Social Workers (2007). Indicators for the Achievement of the NASW Standards for Cultural Competence in Social Work Practice. Washington: Author.

Pedersen, P. B., H. C. Crethar, & J. Carlson (2008). Inclusive Cultural Empathy: Making Relationships Central in Counseling and Psychotherapy. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Race, R. (2011). Multiculturalism and Education. London and New York: Continuum.

Reitz, J. G., R. Breton, K. K. Dion, & K. L. Dion (eds) (2009). Multiculturalism and Social Cohesion: Potentials and Challenges of Diversity. Dordrecht: Springer.

Rogers, E. M., W. B. Hart, & Y. Miike (2002). Edward T. Hall and the history of intercultural communication: The United States and Japan. Keio Communication Review, 24, 3-26.

Shaules, J. (2007). Deep Culture: The Hidden Challenges of Global Living. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Shaules, J. (2010). Deep Culture Experience: Beneath the Surface. Boston: Intercultural Press.

Sheldon, B. & G. Macdonald (2009). A Textbook of Social Work. London and New York: Routledge.

Snow, C. P. (1959/1964). The Two Cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Spitzberg, B. H. (1989). Issues in the development of a theory of interpersonal competence in the intercultural context. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13, 241-268.

Stuart, P. H. (2008). Social work profession: History. In: T. Mizrahi & L. E. Davis (eds), Encyclopedia of Social Work, 20th Edition, Volume 4 (pp. 156-164). Washington: NASW Press and New York: Oxford University Press.

Sue, D. W. (2006). Multicultural Social Work Practice. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Škorić, M. (2004). Kognitivni aspekti antropologije etniciteta. Sociološki pregled 38 (1-2): 281-307.

Škorić, M. (2006). Predrasude i stereotipi kao elementi antropologije etniciteta. U: M. Tripković (ur.), Multikulturna Vojvodina u evropskim integracijama. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za sociologiju, str. 285-307.

Škorić, M. (2010). Sociologija nauke: mertonovski i konstruktivistički programi. Sremski Karlovci i Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.

Škorić, M. i A. Kišjuhas (2012a). Bartova teorija o strukturalnim rupama. U: V. Sokolovska i M. Škorić (ur.), Analiza socijalnih mreža II. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet, str. 11-43.

Škorić, M. i A. Kišjuhas (2012b). Glokalizacija kao hibridizacija i heterogenizacija globalnog. U: V. Sokolovska i D. Marinković (ur.), Regioni i regionalizacija: sociološki aspekti. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing, str. 63-92.

Škorić, M. i A. Kišjuhas (2014). Vodič kroz ideologije I. Novi Sad: AKO.

Škorić, M. i A. Kišjuhas (2015). Vodič kroz ideologije II. Novi Sad: AKO.

Škorić, M. i A. Tomašević (2011). Granoveterova teorija o snazi slabih veza. Sociološki pregled 45 (3): 323-336.

Tyler, F. B. (2001). Cultures, Communities, Competence, and Change. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Van Wormer, K. (2007). Human Behavior and the Social Environment, Micro Level: Individuals and Families. New York: Oxford University Press.

Watt, D. (2007). Toward a neuroscience of empathy: Integrating affective and cognitive perspectives. Neuropsychoanalysis: An interdisciplinary Journal for Psychoanalysis and the Neurosciences, 9, 119-140.

Wellman, B. (1999). Living networked on and offline. Contemporary Sociology, 28, 648-654.

Willett, C. (ed.) (1998). Theorizing Multiculturalism: A Guide to the Current Debate. Maiden: Blackwell Publishers.