REDUCTION IN PHENOMENOLOGY AND PAINTING
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article establishes a premise that the artist differs from a philosopher in that he is by the very nature of his work already in the plain of experience of the phenomenological reduction. Starting with the methodological assumptions of phenomenology, which value above all the departure from the boundaries of mundane philosophy, the author points out that modern art finds the notions of holding onto in any form the reproduction of existing reality very foreign. The second part of the article analyses the philosophical insights which interpret modern painting as the spontaneous negation of the natural attitude. The representation of the transformation of the term of abstraction additionally illuminates the relationship between of phenomenology and modern art. Departing from the expressly negative and the affirmation of the positive meanings of abstraction come from the fundamental change in the relation towards the existing world. If for phenomenology abstracting means practicing a view that from its own freedom creates new forms, named by the ancient term eidos, then we are discussing a generality that transcends the particular phenomena of the natural world. In search for such eidos lies the foundation of the relationship between phenomenology and painting.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Becker, O. (1929) »Von der Hinfälligkeit des Schönen und der Abenteuerlichkeit des Künstlers. Eine ontologische Untersuchung«, u: Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Phäenomenologische Forschung, M. Niemeyer, Halle a. d. Salle.
Ferry, L. (2012) De l’amour. Une philosophie pour le XXI℮ siècle, Odile Jacob, Paris.
Gadamer, H. G. (1960) Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970) »Wer denkt abstrakt?«, u: Jenaer Schriften (1801-1807), Werke II, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am/M.
Husserl, E. (1966) Analysen zur passiven Synthesis, Husserliana XI, M. Nijhoff, Den Haag, Hg. M. Fleischer
Husserl, E. (1972) Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchung zur Genealogie der Logik, F. Meiner, Hamburg.
Jonas, H. (1996) Entre le néant et l’éternité, Belin, Paris 1996, tr. S. Courtine-Denamy.
Kandinsky, V. (1912) Über das Geistige in der Kunst. Insbesondere in der Malerei, R. Piper & Co, München.
Lipps, T. (1923) Grundlegung der Ästhetik, L. Voss, Leipzig.
Lyotard, J.-F. (2008) Que peindre? Adami, Arakawa, Buren, Hermann, Paris.
Maljevič, K. (2010) »Suprematizam kao čista spoznaja«, u: Bog nije zbačen. Sabrana dela, Plavi krug/Logos, Beograd, prev. A. Acović [et. al.]
Moran, D./Cohen, J. (2012) »Abstraction«, u: The Husserl Dictionary, Continuum, London/New York.
Оrtega y Gasset, J. (1978) »Über den Blickpunkt in der Kunst«, u: Gesammelte Werke III, Deutsche Verlags – Anstalt, Stuttgart, Üb. U. Weber.
Patočka, J. (1988) Qu’est-ce que la phénoménologie, Grenoble 1988, tr. E. Abrams.
Patočka, J. (1990) L’Art et le temps, P.O.L. Paris 1990, tr. E. Abrams.
Sartre, J.-P. (1948) L’imaginaire. Psychologie phénoménologique de l’imagination, Gallimard, Paris.
Wiesing, L. (2005) Artifizielle Präsenz. Studien zur Philosophie des Bildes, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am/M.
Wiesing, L. (2013) Sehen lassen. Die Praxis des Zeigens, Suhrkamp, Berlin 2013.
Worringer, W. (1921) Künstlerische Zeitfragen, H. Bruckmann, München.
Worringer, W. (1959) Abstraktion und Einfühlung. Ein Beitrag zur Stilpsychologie, R. Piper & Co, München.