GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY AS A MODERATOR OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN TEST ANXIETY, COPING AND THE OUTCOMES OF A STRESSFUL TRANSACTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The theoretical bases of our current empirical research is the revised version of the Taylor and Aspinwall model (The Taylor and Aspinwall Model, 1996), which includes a comprehensive and contemporary conceptual framework for understanding the components of a generic phenomenon of the stress concept and their mutual relations. The validated model includes four sets of variables: a) stressor (test anxiety), b) coping (three categories of coping mechanisms: task-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, and avoidance), c) a stable personality trait (general self-efficacy as an internal resource for coping), and d) the output variables of the stress-process (success achieved at the colloquium and the emotional state of students immediately after the test situation). Examination of the stress-process variable space was carried out by application of the following measuring instruments: Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI), Coping Inventory for Task Stress (CITS), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), and the Serbian adaptation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (SIAB-PANAS). For data processing we applied the statistical procedure of moderated mediation analysis. The paper presents in details and discusses specific conditions under which a certain level of the examined moderator variable (general self-efficacy) significantly changes the following relations: a) test anxiety – a choice of coping strategies, b) applied coping mechanisms - outcomes of the examined stressful transaction and c) a direct relationship between stressors and output variables.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Barry, C. L., & Finnely, S. J. (2009). Can we feel confident in how we measure college confidence? A psychometric investigation of the college self-efficacy inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42(3), 197-222.
Carpenter, B. N., & Scott, S. M. (1992). Interpersonal aspects of coping. In B. N. Carpenter (Ed.), Personal coping: Theory, research, and application. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Chapell, M. S., Blanding, Z. B., Silverstein, M. E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A., & McCann, N. (2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 268-274.
Colodro, H., Godoy-Izquierdo, D., & Godoy, J. (2010). Coping self-efficacy in a community-based sample of women and men from the United Kingdom: The impact of sex and health status. Behavioral Medicine, 36:12, 12-23.
Fajgelj, S. (2004). Metode istraživanja ponašanja. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.
Folkman, S. (2008). The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 21(1), 3-14.
Genc, A. (2014). Relacije između stres-procesa i ispitne anksioznosti – distorzije u sećanjima na emocije iz prošlih stresnih transakcija. Doktorska disertacija.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis – A regression-based approach. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
Herringtin, A. N, Matheny, K. B., Curlette, W. L., McCarthy, C. J., & Penick, J. (2005). Lifestyles, coping resources, and negative life events as predictors of emotional distress in university women. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 61(4), 343-364.
Juretić, J. (2008). Socijalna i ispitna anksioznost te percepcija samoefikasnosti kao prediktori ishoda ispitna situacije. Psihologijske teme, 17, 15-36.
Jovanović, V. (2010). Validacija kratke skale subjektivnog blagostanja. Primenjena Psihologija, 2, 175-190.
Jovanović, V., & Gavrilov-Jerković, V. (2013). Dimensionality and validity of the Serbian version of the Life Orientation Test-Revised in a sample of youths. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 14(3), 771-782.
Lindley, L. D., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Generalized self-efficacy, Holland theme self-efficacy, and academic performance. Journal of Career Assessment, 10(3), 301-314.
Luszczynska, A., Gutiérezz-Dona, B., & Schwarzer R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries, International Journal of Psychology, 40 (2), 80-89.
Luszczynska, A, Scholz, U., & Swarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457.
Maddux, J. E. (2005). Self-efficacy: The power of believing you can. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marszalek, J. M. (2009). Validation of a TAI Short Form with an adolescent sample. Journal of General Psychology, 136(4), 333-349.
Martin, A. J., Marsch, H., & Debus, R. L. (2001). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 87-102.
Masthoff, E. D., Trompenaars, F. J., Van Heck, G. L., Michielsen, H. J., Hodiamont, P. P., & De Vries, J. (2007). Predictors of quality of life: A model based study. Quality of Life Research, 16, 309–320.
Matthews, G., Hillyard, E. J., & Campbell, S. E. (1999). Metacognition and maladaptive coping as components of test anxiety. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 111-125.
Matthews, G., Emo, A. K., Funke, G., Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D., Costa, P. T., & Schilze, R. (2006). Emotional intelligence, personality, and task-induced stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(2), 96-107.
Michielsen, H. J., Croon, M. A., Willemsen, T. M., De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (2007). Which constructs can predict emotional exhaustion in a working population? A study into its determinants. Stress and Health, 23, 121–130.
Mihić, Lj., Novović, Z., Čolović, P., & Smederevac, S. (2014). Serbian adaptation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): It's facets and second-order structure. Psihologija, 47(4), 393-414.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2003). Modeling statistics achievement among graduate students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 1020-1038.
Quinn, H. L., Engley, E., & Knight. C. B. (1991). The effects of trait anxiety on state anxiety and perception of test difficulty for undergraduates administered high and low difficulty tests. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 18(1), 65-68.
Silver, B. B. Smith, E, V, & Greene, B A. (2001). A Study strategies self-efficacy instrument for use with community college students. Educational and psychological measurement, 61(5), 849-865.
Trouillet, R., Gana, K., Lourel, M., & Fort, I. (2009). Predictive value of age for coping: The role of self-efficacy, social support satisfaction and perceived stress. Aging and Mental Health, 13(3), 357-366.
Verhaeren, T. (2012). Is a strong sense of self-efficacy always beneficial? Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 5(54), 193-200.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Developement and validation of brief measure of Positive and Negative Affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Williams, J. E. (1994). Anxiety measurement: Construct validity and test performance. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 302-307.
Whitaker Sena, J. D., Lowe, P. A., & Lee, S. W. (2007). Significant predictors of test anxiety among students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(4), 360-376.