CRITIQUE AND UNIVERSALITY OF PHILOSOPHY Review of Hegel’s text “On the Essence of Philosophical Criticism”
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this article author investigates Hegel’s concept of philosophical critique against the background of his philosophical development in Jena. Naturally, the focal point of this investigation is the text with the title “On the Essence of Philosophical Criticism”, but this interpretation relies also on other Hegel’s important early writings. However, this text sets up the framework of the whole interpretation, because it explicitly puts forward the fundamental relation between critique and idea of universal philosophy which is the topic of this article. In order to understand correctly Hegel’s concept of philosophical critique, it is of greatest importance to see it acting as a consciousness of philosopher’s epoch. Concretely, philosophical critique reflects upon educational, scientific, cultural and ideological horizon of one’s time. Regarding Hegel’s time, this horizon was fundamentally derived from the intellectual and ideological edifice of critical philosophy, which was made transparent through principle of subjectivism as its dominant trend. Therefore, the task of philosophical critique is to understand philosophy historically, to account for its historical reality and given experiences expressed in the form of philosophy of subjectivism. It is clear in what way Hegel’s notion of philosophical critique differs from Kant’s concept of critique of pure mind. One of the main characteristics of different philosophical system of that time lies in their shared misunderstanding of the nature of philosophical cognition. This misunderstanding was brought forth by Kantian philosophical project and it basically interprets the problem of cognition as principally unsolvable dualism between the subject and the object. This standpoint is for Hegel symptom of the wrong understanding of the nature of philosophical thinking and its relation to the absolute. The subjective principle, upon which many of his contemporaries build their philosophical system, represents just one limited step in the historical development of philosophy. This is why the most important task of philosophical critique, according to Hegel, is to subject to its criticism the whole scope of limitations of philosophy.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
References
Bristow, William F. (2007). Hegel and the Transformation of Philosophical Critique, Oxford
University Press.
Bubner, Rüdiger. (1969). „Problemgeschichte und systematischer Sinn einer Phänomenologie“,
Hegel-Studien 5: 129 – 159.
Bubner, Rüdiger. (2003). The Innovations of Idealism, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Buchner, Hartmut. (1965). „Hegel und das Kritische Journal der Philosophie“. Hegel-Studien 3:
95 – 156.
De Boer, Karin. (2010). “Hegel’s Conception of Immanent Critique: Its Sources, Extent and
Limit”, In: (ed.) de Boer, K. And Sonderegger, R. 2010. Conceptions of Critique in Modern
and Contemporary Philosophy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 83–100.
Hartmann, Eduard von. (1868). Über dialektische Methode. Historisch-kritische
Untersuchungen, Berlin: Carl Dunckers Verlag.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970a). Werke. Band 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970b). Werke. Band 3. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970c). Werke. Band 8. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Lauer, Christopher. (2010). The Suspension of Reason in Hegel and Schelling, New York:
Continuum.
Smith, John H. (1985). “Rhetorical Polemics and the Dialectics of “Kritik” in Hegel’s Jena
Essays”. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 18 (1): 31–57.
Trede, Johann Heinrich. (1972). „Hegels frühe Logik (1801 – 1803/4). Versuch einer
systematischer Rekonstruktion“. Hegel-Studien 7: 123–168.