BASE-GENERATED OR DERIVED? HERE'S HOW TO TELL STRUCTURES APART IN RUSSIAN.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper argues that the Scope Freezing Diagnostic (Antonyuk 2015; 2020) is an accurate test of relative argument relations and a reliable diagnostic for base-generated structures in Russian. An important novel finding reported here is that a vP-internal argument permutation, Argument Inversion, is mediated by Animacy, leading to the promotion of the lower [+Animate] argument to a position c-commanding its co-argument. Crucially, such permutations are shown here to result in an order that allows Focus projection, and one that is widely perceived to be discourse-neutral, hence routinely analyzed as underived. The diagnostic is argued to be a more accurate test of argument relations than other syntactic tests proposed in the literature, as well as a valuable diagnostic overall, one that has helped uncover Animacy as a pervasive and previously unrecognized confound on Information Structure and its complex interactions with argument structure in Russian. Theoretical and methodological implications of our findings are discussed.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Aissen, J. (2003) Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483
Antonyuk, S. (2015) Quantifier Scope and Scope Freezing in Russian. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stony Brook University
Antonyuk, S. (2019) Quantifier Scope in Russian. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4(1): 54. 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.562
Antonyuk, S. (2020) The puzzle of Russian ditransitives. In Anna Pineda & Jaume Mateu (eds.), Dative constructions in Romance and beyond, 43–74. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.377653
Antonyuk, S. (2021) Russian OVS: towards a Better Understanding of the Construction’s Properties and Significance. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 29: FASL extra issue. http://ojs.ung.si/index.php/JSL/article/view/156
Antonyuk, S. & R. Mykhaylyk (2022) Scope freezing and object shift in Ukrainian: Does Superiority matter?. Syntax. 00:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12229
Antonyuk, S. (2022) Object-Shifting and Head-Raising One's Way to Discourse Configurationality. In Markéta Janebová, Joseph Emonds, and Ludmila Veselovská, eds. Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2021. Olomouc: Palacký University.
Antonyuk, S. (under review) On Methodology: The Scope Freezing Diagnostic (SFD) as a Diagnostic Tool for Probing Underlying Argument Structure Relations. Ms. University of Graz
Antonyuk, S. (in preparation) On the Syntax of Experiencer Constructions in East Slavic. Ms. University of Graz
Bailyn, J. F. (1995) A Configurational Approach to Russian ‘Free’ Word Order. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Bailyn, J. F. (2004) Generalized Inversion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22: 1- 49.
Bailyn, J. F. (2012) The syntax of Russian. Cambridge University Press.
Baker, M. C. (1988) Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baker, M. C. (1997) Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In Elements of Grammar, edited by Liliane Haegeman, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Branigan, H., Martin J. Pickering & T. Mikihiro (2008) Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua 118(2): 172-189.
Bruening, B. (2001) QR obeys Superiority: Frozen scope and ACD. Linguistic Inquiry 32:233–273.
Cinque, G. (1993). A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2), 239–297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178812
Dyakonova, M. (2009) A-phase-order. Ph.D. dissertation, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Franks, S. (1995) Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glushan, Z. (2013) The Role of Animacy in Russian Morphosyntax. Doctoral Dissertations. 264. University of Connecticut.
Grabska, D., & Abels, K. (2022) On the distribution of scope ambiguities in Polish, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics7(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.8170
Ionin, T. (2003) The one girl who was kissed by every boy: Scope, scrambling and discourse function in Russian. In Marjo van Koppen, Joanna Sio & Mark de Vos (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE X, 65–80. Leiden: SOLE.
Isačenko, A. (1966) O grammatičeskom porjadke slov. Voprosy jazykoznanija 6: 27–34.
Janko, T. (1991) Коммуникативная _структура _с _неингерентной _темой _// Научно-техническая _информация, Сер. 2, 1991, No. 7, 27-32.
Janko, T. (2001) Kommunikativnye strategii russkoj reči, Moscow: Jazyki Slavjanskoj Kul’tury.
Junghanns, U. & G. Zybatow. (1997) Syntax and Information Structure of Russian Clauses. In Wayles Browne (ed.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 4: The Cornell Meeting, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, 289–319.
Kallestinova, E. (2007) Aspects of word order in Russian. Ann Arbor: UMI.
Kayne, R. S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kovtunova, I. (1976) Sovremennyj russkij yazyk. Por’adok slov i aktual’noe členenie predloženija. Moscow. (=’Modern Russian Language. Word Order and Communicative Perspective’ – in Russian).
Krause, E. & K. von Heusinger. (2019) Gradient Effects of Animacy on Differential Object Marking in Turkish. Open Linguistics 5 (1), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0011
Krylov, S (2001) Дополнение // Энциклопедия «Россия on-line» www.krugosvet.ru
Krylov, S. (2007) О понятии дополнения в современной лингвистике //Язык и действительность. Памяти _В.Г.Гака _// М. –УРСС.
Kučerová, I. (2007) The syntax of givenness. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Kučerová, I. (2012) Grammatical marking of givenness. Nat Lang Semantics 20, 1-30.
Lacerda, R. (2020) Middle-field Syntax and Information Structure in Brazilian Portuguese. Doctoral Dissertations. University of Connecticut.
Landau, I. (2010) The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph. The MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts. London, England.
Larson, R. K. (1988) On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-391.
Larson, R. K. (1990) Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry, 21: 589–632.
Larson, R. K. (2004) Sentence-final adverbs and scope. In Proceedings of NELS 34, M. Wolf & K. Moulton (eds.). 23-43. UMSAA: GLSA.
Larson, R. K. (2014) On Shell Structure. London: Routledge.
Larson, R.K., S. Antonyuk & L. Liu. (2019). Superiority and scope freezing. Linguistic Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00300
Lavine, J. E., & Freidin, R. (2002) The Subject of Defective T(ense) in Slavic. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10 (1/2), 251–287. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24599685
Malchukov, A. (2008) Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118(2): 203-221
Mykhaylyk, R., R. Rodina & M. Anderssen. (2013). Ditransitive constructions in Russian and Ukrainian: Effect of givenness on word order. Lingua 137: 271-289.
Paducheva, E. (1985) Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s dejstvitel’nost’ju. Мoscow.
Palmer, F.R. (1994) Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Pesetsky, D. (1982) Paths and Categories. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Preslar, M. (1998) The Subject Position in Russian Impersonal Sentences. Linguistic Analysis 28(1–2): 33–66.
Ramchand, G. (2008) Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reinhart, T. (1995) Interface Strategies. OTS working papers in linguistics. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/17195
Selkirk, E. (1984) Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Selkirk, E. (1995) Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress, and Phrasing. in J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, London: Basil Blackwell, pp. 550–569
Sirotinina, I. (1965/2003) Porjadok slov v russkom jazyke. Moscow: Editorial, URSS.
Slioussar, N. (2007) Grammar and Information Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Schneider-Zioga, P. (1988) Double objects and small clauses. Ms., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Stjepanovic, S. (1999) What do second-position cliticization, scrambling and multiple wh-fronting have in common? Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Connecticut.
de Swart, P. (2006) Case markedness. In: Kulikov, L., Malchukov, A., de Swart, P. (Eds.), Case, Valency and Transitivity. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 249–267.
de Swart, P., Monique Lamers, Sander Lestrade (2008) Animacy, argument structure, and argument encoding. Lingua 118(2): 131-140
Tomlin, R. (1986) Basic Word Order: Functional Principles. Croom Helm, London.
von Heusinger, K. & G. A. Kaiser. (2003) Animacy, specificity, and definiteness in Spanish. In Klaus von Heusinger & Georg A. Kaiser (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Specificity in Romance Languages (Arbeitspapier 113), 41–65. Universtität Konstanz
Yokoyama, O. (1986) Discourse and Word Order. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Zanon, K. (2015) On hybrid coordination and quantifier raising in Russian. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University dissertation.
Zimmerling, A. (2007) Порядок слов в русском языке. In: Текст. Структура и семантика. Доклады XI международной конференции M. Moscow, 138-151.
Zubizarreta, M.L. (1998) Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.