MANDARIN EXISTENTIAL CONSTRUCTIONS AND THE PREDICATE RESTRICTION

Main Article Content

Jing Gao

Abstract

In this paper I raise questions about the predicate restriction, which claims that only stage-level predicates may appear in the coda of an existential sentence. I present novel data from Mandarin to show that the predicate restriction is not universal: It is systematically absent in Mandarin. I propose that the reason behind its absence is syntactic. Specifically, I show that the English existential coda cannot be as large as a TP, while the Mandarin existential coda contains a full TP. This, in combination with Diesing’s (1992) Mapping Hypothesis, which says individual-level predicates need to be in TPs, naturally derives the difference between existentials of the English-type and those of the Mandarin-type. Finally, I show that the Mandarin existential coda is not a relative clause, despite being a full clause. Thus, this paper seeks to attain two purposes: (i) to bring attention to the possibility of violations of the predicate restriction, which has largely been thought to be universal; and (ii) to make a first attempt at explaining why the predicate restriction is absent in Mandarin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Gao, J. (2023). MANDARIN EXISTENTIAL CONSTRUCTIONS AND THE PREDICATE RESTRICTION. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, 47(3), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2022.3.135-148
Section
SinFonIJA 14 Special Issue

References

Bentley, D. –Ciconte, F. M. & Cruschina, S. (2012). Existential constructions in crosslinguistic perspective. Rivisata di Linguistica, 25(1), 1-13.

Diesing, M. (1992). Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 23(3), 353-380.

Fang, H. & Lin, T.-H. J. (2008). The Mandarin you existential: A verbal analysis. UST Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 43-56.

Francez, I. (2007). Existential propositions. Stanford University dissertation.

Gao, J. (2020). A syntactic analysis of the Mandarin postnominal relative clause. In Asatryan, M. –Song, Y. & Whitmal, A. (eds.) (2020). Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 247-260.

Li, C.N. & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Liu, Y.-H. (2011). Topic-comment and the Chinese existential construction. In: Jing-Schmidt, Z. (ed.) (2011). Proceedings of the 23rd North American Conference on Chinese Lingusitics, 48-65.

McNally, L. (2011). Existential sentences. In: Maienborn, C., –von Heusinger, K. & Portner, P. (eds.) (2011). Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 1829-1848. Mouton de Gruyter.

Milsark, G. (1979). Existential sentences in English. New York: Garland.

Zhang, N. N. (2008). Existential coda constructions as internally headed relative constructions. The Linguistics Journal, 3(3), 8-54.