MUSEUM AS A “THIRD SPACE”
Main Article Content
Abstract
Modern life and society development, as a result of technological progress and accelerated flow of information, require an individual to study longer and acquire more knowledge than formal institutions provide. Therefore, lifelong and informal learning becomes an imperative of modern life, while social interaction is the central and most important concept for their realization. Current considerations on how to organize the functioning of museums for the purpose of more effective learning create a certain pressure on them that should lead to the transformation of learning in the museum, which would be the result of social interactions and active participation in the community of those who learn, instead of the transmission of information. The "third space", apart from being an informal space for learning, is a place where new learning patterns and new knowledge are created through the integration of experiences gained in different situations, and a place of transformation of participation in community practice, where the potential for the creation and development of new knowledge grows. More and more active work is being done to improve learning in the museum in which there is a rich interaction between visitors, and visitors and curators or exhibited objects, so the goal of this research is reflected in the perception of museums as "third spaces" that enable visitors to learn from each other in an informal context in mutual cooperation, and with their joint contribution create new communities of practice and new knowledge. The goal is achieved by applying the method of theoretical analysis and the technique of content analysis. In the first part of the paper, different approaches to the concept of the "third space" are presented, while in the second part of the paper, perceiving the museum within that concept is analyzed. As an informal learning space, the museum represents a large source of opportunities for learning, regardless of whether the learning is unconscious or self-directed. It provides the opportunity to engage in different learning communities, and within those communities, to connect old and new experiences, redefine old experiences, develop new patterns of learning, transform relationships and build new connections. The pedagogical implications of this paper include a better understanding of the museum as a "third space", because through such a way of observing the museum, the social context of learning is emphasized as necessary for the construction of new knowledge.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Cox, A.M. (2018). Space and embodiment in informal learning. High Educ, 75, 1077–1090. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0186-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0186-1
Crook, C., & Witcomb, G. L. (2012). Ambience in social learning: Student engagement with new designs for learning spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 121–139. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2012.676627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.676627
Harrop, D., & Turpin, B. (2013). A Study Exploring Learners’ Informal Learning Space Behaviors, Attitudes and Preferences. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19, 58–77. doi:10.1080/13614533.2013.740961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2013.740961
Leinhardt, G. (2014). Museums, conversations, and learning. Revista Colombiana de Psicologia, 23(1), 13–33. doi:10.15446/rcp.v23n1.41000Dekart, R. (1951). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v23n1.41000
Matusov, E., & Rogoff, B. (1995). Evidence of Development from People’s Participation in Communities of Learners. In J. H. Falk, & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Public Institutions for Personal Learning. American Association of Museums. Preuzeto sa https://ematusov.soe.udel.edu/vita/Articles/Matusov,%20Rogoff,%20Evidence%20of%20development%20in%20museum,%201996.pdf
Milutinović, J. (2010). Učenje u muzeju. Povijest u nastavi, 8(2), 217–229.
Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and Discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39 (1), 38–70. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place. Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of community. Marlowe & Company: New York.
Oldenburg, R. (1996-97). Our Vanishing “Third Places”. Planning Commissioners Journal, 25, 6–10.
Riddle, M. D., & Souter, K. (2012). Designing informal learning spaces using student perspectives. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2). Preuzeto sa https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152692
Rogers, A. (2014). The Base of the Iceberg. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Barbara Budrich Publishers. doi:10.3224/84740632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/84740632
Sterrett, S. (2015). Interprofessional Learning as a Third Space: Rethinking Health Profession Students’ Development and Identity through the Concepts of Homi Bhabha. Humanities, 4, 653–660. doi:10.3390/h4040653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/h4040653
UNESCO. (2009). Global Report on Adult Learning and Education. Hamburg: UILL. Preuzeto sa https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:23109
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Mind and Society, 79–91. Preuzeto sa https://innovation.umn.edu/igdi/wp-content/uploads/sites/37/2018/08/Interaction_Between_Learning_and_Development.pdf