WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO PLAY? DISABILITY AND AESTHETICS OF EXISTENCE

Main Article Content

Dragan Prole

Abstract

The article explores the relationship of disabled persons and theater, starting with the work of the Per-Art Association. In the first part, the author emphasizes that the mode of on- togeny of social solidarity with the disabled persons did not result in their greater representation in the arts but in a lesser one. After pointing out that the presence of disabled persons on the canvas has for centuries been reduced to a mechanisms thanks to which the everyday awareness of the “common” grew stronger, and rejected with ease all that deviated from the socially accept- able norms, the author analyzes the specificity of the inclusive gestures on the contemporary theater scene. Unlike the introduction of specific characters with disabilities into the conven- tional plays, the author points out that the everyday regime of care recognizes the disabled persons as objects, which must be taken care of by someone, while the conditions of the group artistic work enable them to tailor their own character so they need not rely upon the expectations and concepts of others. In the second part of the paper the author confronts the Foucault’s term of aesthetics of existence with the theater work of the disabled persons. Appearing within a group, such persons enable a moral conversion, as the meaning of the scene movement transforms into an independent moral request. Meeting the foreign of the disabled persons, for the audience, becomes a synonym for a breakthrough in the egoistical search for the self in others, and for the actors themselves, marks a chance to break the social separation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Prole, D. (2015). WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO PLAY? DISABILITY AND AESTHETICS OF EXISTENCE. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, 40(2), 223–235. Retrieved from https://godisnjak.ff.uns.ac.rs/index.php/gff/article/view/1517
Section
Филозофија

References

Bass, A. (2006) Interpretation and Difference. The Strangeness of Care, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Becker, U. (2015), Die Inklusionslüge. Behinderung im flexiblen Kapitalismus. Transcript, Bielefeld.

Buber, M. (1962) »Urdistanz und Beziehung«, u: Werke I. Schriften zur Philosophie, Kösel, München.

Fuko, M. (2002) Nenormalni, Svetovi, Novi Sad, prev. M. Kozić.

Fuko, M. (2006) Istorija seksualnosti I, Karpos, Loznica, prev. J. Stakić

Levinas, E. (1968) Totalité et infini. Essai sur l’extériorité, M. Nijhoff, La Haye.

Straus, J. N. (2011), Extraordinary Measures. Disability in Music, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.

Rancière, J. (1981) La nuit des prolétaires. Archives du rêve ouvrier, Fayard, Paris.

Rancière, J. (2004) The Politics of Aestetics, London/New York, tr. G. Rockhill.

Rösner, H.-U. (2014) Behindert sein – behindert werden. Texte zu einer dekonstruktuven Ethik behinderten Menschen, Transkript, Bielefeld.

van Rijn, M. (2011) »Die Gespielen der Infantin. Darstellungen kleinwüchsiger Menschen in der bildenden Kunst«, u: Disability History. Konstruktionen von Behinderung in der Geschichte, Transcript, Bielefeld, Hg. E. Bösl [et. al.].

Vladisavljević, N. (2006) Ovako ima smisla da živim ovako, [s.n.] Novi Sad.

Vladisavljević, N. (2014) Sunce na vagonu, Per Art, Novi Sad.