Contemporaneity of the Primitive and the Primitivity of the Contemporary

Main Article Content

Dragan Prole

Abstract

The article examines the contemporary actualization of the »primitive« within a historical horizon in which the various institutes for racial research were founded all around Europe. The contemporaneity of the »primitive« was accompanied by mounting political tension, which reached ist peak during the Nazi regime. The author points out that the art, Nazis labeled degenerate, was not being denounced that way because it had allegedly spoiled and corrupted the virtues of the German people, but due to the fact that from the avand-garde perspective the whole Nazi ideology necessary turns out as dishonest, if not »degenerate«. The sympathetic response to »primitive art« become a reliable confirmation of a special affinity with pro-Western and liberal values. The second part of the paper uncovers the paradox of the new primitivism. Bearing in mind strictly artistic criteria, with respect to its contemporary hermeneutical milieu, the picture of new primitivism would have totally different lighting. The conclusion shows how the strategy of the avant-garde usage of the »primitive« objects fits perfectly into typically European tradition of the appropriation and adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Prole, D. Contemporaneity of the Primitive and the Primitivity of the Contemporary. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, 43(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2018.1.143-155
Section
Филозофија
Author Biography

Dragan Prole, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu

Odsek za filozofiju

References

Adam, Leonhard (1948) Primitive Art, Penguin Books, London.

Agamben, Giorgio (2009) »What Is Contemporary?«, u: What is Apparatus? and Other Essays, Stanford University Press, Stanford, tr. D. Kishik⁄S. Pedatella.

Antlif, Mark ⁄Letjen, Patriša (2004) »Primitivno«, u: Kritički termini istorije umetnosti, prir. R. Nelson⁄R. Šif, Svetovi, Novi Sad, prev. Lj. Petrović⁄P. Šaponja.

Boas, Franz (1922) »The Methods of Ethnology«, u: American Antropologist Vol. 22, October-December.

Därmann, Iris (2004) Fremde Monde der Vernunft. Die ethnologische Provokation der Philosophie, W. Fink, München.

de Micheli, Mario (1990) Umjetničke avangarde XX. stoljeća, NZMH, Zagreb 1990, prev. M. Vekarić.

Errington, Shelly (1998) The Death of Authentic Primitive Art and Other Tales of Progress, University of California Press, Berkeley⁄Los Angeles.

Foht, Ivan (1965) Moderna umetnost kao ontološki problem, Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd.

Fuhrmann, Manfred (2000) Der europäische Bildungskanon des bürgerlichen Zeitalters, Insel, Frankfurt am/M./Leipzig.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1970) Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie I, Werke Band XVIII, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am/M.

Maljevič, Kazimir (2010) »Suprematizam kao čista spoznaja«, u: Bog nije zbačen, Sabrana dela, Plavi krug/Logos, Beograd, prev. A. Acović [et al.]

Matisse, Henri (1972) Écrits et propos sur l’art, Hermann, Paris, éd. D. Fourcade.

Micić, Ljubomir (1922) »Paraliza Evrope«, u: Zenit II, 23. 09. 1922, Beograd-Zagreb.

Radin, Paul (1971) The World of Primitive Man, Dutton&Co, New York.

Shimada, Shingo (1994) Grenzgänge-Fremdgänge. Japan und Europa im Kulturvergleich, Campus Frankfurt-New York.

Todorov, Tzvetan (1985) Die Eroberung Amerikas. Das Problem des Anderen, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am/M., üb. W. Böhringer.

Wiennand, Kea (2015) Nach dem Primitivismus? Künstlerische Verhandlungen kultureller Differenz in der BRD 1960-1990. Eine postkoloniale Relektüre, Transkript, Bielefeld.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1967) »Bemerkungen über Frazers The Golden Bough«, u: Synthese 17, Dodrecht.