ASPECT AND AKTIONSART OF SECONDARY ASPECTUAL VERBS IN SERBIAN

Main Article Content

Nataša Milivojević

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to investigate aspectual value of secondary aspectual verb phrase in Serbian in terms of both grammatical and lexical aspect (Aktionsart). The present analysis focuses on two secondary aspectualizers krenuti and stati, which when used as lexical verbs have the opposite meanings related to motion in space, but when they appear as phase construction heads both verbs modify the opening segment of the aspectual event. The central idea of the proposal is that event types in general largely depend on temporal structures which need to be contextualized before they are formally identifiable. In other words, contrary to traditional approaches which define lexical aspect as inherent to verb meaning, we claim that each verb form (or any lexical and/or grammatical form for that matter) has an underlying meaning through which it entertains systematic relations with other forms in a language (Hirtle 1982:40). We start form aspectual and Aktionsart features of krenuti and stati as verb lexemes, then move onto the level of syntax to identify the co-compositional aspect of the overall phase construction via event structure and event segmentation mechanisms. Finally, the present paper aims to examine different uses of the two secondary aspectual verbs, along with the different types of events they can denote in order to bring to light the potential meanings which give rise to the various contextual senses of the aspectual construction. The reported results of the analysis were checked on the Corpus of Contemporary Serbian Language (SrpKor 2013).


Key words: aspectual constructions, Aktionsart, aspectual event, temporal structure, secondary aspectualizer, event segmentation, event co-composition

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Milivojević, N. (2021). ASPECT AND AKTIONSART OF SECONDARY ASPECTUAL VERBS IN SERBIAN. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, 46(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2021.2.65-80
Section
Англистика

References

SrpKor 2013: Vitas, Duško – Utvić, Miloš. „Korpus savremenog srpskog jezika (SrpKor), verzija SrpKor2013“. Grupa za jezičke tehnologije Univerziteta u Beogradu, Available online at http://www.korpus.matf.bg.ac.rs/korpus/ (Accessed: 1.7.2021).

Stevanović, M. –Marković, S. –Matić, S. –Pešikan, M. (ured.) (1967–1976). Rečnik Matice srpske I-VI: Rečnik srpskohrvatskoga književnog jezika. Novi Sad: Matica srpska, Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.

REFERENCES

Aljović, N. (2000). Unaccusativity and Aspect in Serbocroatian. Proceedings of CONSOLЕ 8, Leiden, Sole, 1 – 15.

Aljović, N. (2015). Aspect of English Unnacusative Verbs”, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277717216_Aspect_of_English_Unaccusative_Verbs [30.3.2021]

Antonić, I. (2000). Aspekatska vrednost predikacije s faznim/modalnim glagolom na primeru rečenice s temporalnom klauzom. Južnoslovenski filolog, 56 (1–2), 93–101.

Arad, M. (1998). Are unaccusatives aspectually characterized?. MIT Working Papers in Linguistic 32, 1-21.

Brinton, L. (1985). Verb Particles in English: Aspect or Aktionsart?”, Studia Linguistica, 157–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1985.tb00750.x

Brinton, L. (1988). The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dowty, D. R. (1977). Toward a Semantic Analysis of Verb Aspect and the English ‘Imperfective’ Progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 45–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351936

Duffley, P. J. (1999). The use of the infinitive and the -ing after verbs denoting the beginning, middle and end of an event. Folia Linguistica XXXIII/3-4, 295 – 331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1999.33.3-4.295

Duffley, P. J. (2006). The English gerund-participle in cognitive grammar. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.

Freed, A. (1979). The Semantics of English Aspectual Complementation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9475-1

Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Goldberg, A. (2009). Constructions and Semantic Frames. In: Rappaport Hovav, M., E. Doron and I. Sichel (eds.). Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0003

Harley, H. (1999). Denominal verbs and Aktionsart. In: L. Pylkanen and A. van Hout (eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd Penn/MIT Rundatble on Event Structure, MITWPL: Cambridge, 73–85.

Harley, H. (2010). How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporaton and the ontology of verb roots in English. In: Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and T. Rapoport (eds.). The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0003

Hirtle, W. H. (1988). Events, Time and the Simple Form. Revue québécoise de linguistique, 17(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.7202/602615ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/602615ar

Ivić, M. (1961). O pojavama sintaksičke obaveznosti. Godišnjak Filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, knjiga VI, 180–190.

Ivić, M. (1983). Lingvistički ogledi. Beograd: Prosveta.

Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Levin, B. (2000). Aspect, Lexical Semantic Representation, and Argument Expression. BLS 26: General Session and Parasession on Aspect, 413–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v26i1.1129

Author (2016). Konstrukcioni idiomi u engleskom i srpskom jeziku. E-disertacija10. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet. http://digitalna.ff.uns.ac.rs/sadrzaj/2016/978-86-6065-384-2

Author (2021a). O analitičkim predikatima sa glaglom krenuti u srpskom jeziku: leksičko-projekcionistički pristup. Srpski jezik, studije srpske i slovenske,26 (I), Naučno društvo za negovanje i proučavanje srpskog jezika, Beograd, 193–216.

Author (2021b). A contrastive account of phase verbs begin and start in English and Serbian. Nasleđe, 21st Century English: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives, 48, 203–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/NasKg2148.203M

Author (2021c). The event-cancelling semantics of the English aspectualizer start and its Serbian equivalent krenuti. Godišnjak filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, knjiga XLVI-1, 31–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2021.1.31-46

Mrazović, P.–Vukadinović, Z. (1990). Gramatika srpskog jezika za strance. Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Dobra vest.

Mourelatos, A.P.D. (1978). Events, Processes and States. Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 415–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149015

Nagy, T. (2009). The Semantics of Aspectualizers in English. (PhD dissertation), Debrecen University

Nagy, T. (2016). On Aspectualizers in English: A Corpus Based Approach. Cluj-Napoca: Scientia Publishing House.

Newmeyer, F., J. (1975). English Aspectual Verbs. The Hague: Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110818451

Palmer, F., R. (2009). Lexical Aspect in English. Selected Papers from the 18th ISTAL. https://www.enl.auth.gr/symposium18/papers/3_PALMER.pdf

Perlmutter, D., M. (1970). The two verbs begin. In: Jacobs R., A. and Rosenbaum P., S. (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn.107-119.

Piper, P.–Antonić, I.–Ružić, V.–Tanasić, S.–Popović, Lj.&Tošović, B. (2005). Sintaksa savremenoga srpskog jezika, Prosta rečenica. Beograd: Institut za srpski jezik SANU.

Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring Events, Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470759127

Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization – via aspect and result, Proceedings of BLS 17, 480–519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620

Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371