CONTRASTING INTRANSITIVE MOTION IN ENGLISH AND SERBIAN: TOWARDS THE PERIPHERY OF THE CONSTRUCTIONAL CONTINUUM

Main Article Content

Nataša Milivojević

Abstract

Set within the theoretical account proposed by Levin (1993) and Goldberg (1995) the paper deals with intransitive motion constructions in English and in Serbian. Specifically, it deals with those instances of the construction where the head element of the structure is a verb of emission (either a verb of sound or light emission). The overal theoretical framework of the research is the combination of two theoretical  models, namely the model ofprojectionist and the model of constructional semantics, while formal descriptions of the construction are offered within the semantic framework proposed by Zwarts ( 2005, 2006). Theoretical results presented in the paper are backed up by literary examples from original texts in English and Serbian, as well as by examples from various online language corpora, serving as  empirical support to the theoretical conclusions of the reserach. The research positions the intransitive motion construction within a larger set of similar resultative constructions in a contrastive perspective, showing that resultatives are a relevant trans-language phenomenon. It is also shown that the full range of meanings exhibited by intransitive motion constructons belongs to a semantic continuum which depends on identical formal and structural restrictions in all of its instances and that this range of meanings is simlarly manifested in both languages under inspection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Milivojević, N. (2017). CONTRASTING INTRANSITIVE MOTION IN ENGLISH AND SERBIAN: TOWARDS THE PERIPHERY OF THE CONSTRUCTIONAL CONTINUUM. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, 41(1), 249–267. Retrieved from https://godisnjak.ff.uns.ac.rs/index.php/gff/article/view/1851
Section
Англистика
Author Biography

Nataša Milivojević

Odsek za anglistiku
Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u  Novom Sadu

References

Borer, H. (2014). Taking Form: Structuring Sense, Volume III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Broccias, S. (2003). The English Change Network: Forcing Changes into Schemas. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cappele, B., & Declerck, R. (2005). Spatial and temporal boundedness in English motion events. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 889-917.
Croft, W., Bardal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & T. Chiaki (2010). Revising Talmy's typological classification of complex events. In: Boas, H. (Ed.) Contrastive construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 201–235.
Croft, W. (2013). Radical Construction Grammar. In: Thomas, H. and G. Trousdale (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 211–233.
Culicover, P.–Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gawron, J. M. (2005). Generalized paths. Proceedings from the Fifteenth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory: SALT XV.
Gehrke, B. (2008). Ps in Motion: On the Semantics and Syntax of P Elements and Motion Events. Utrecht: LOT: LOT Dissertation Series 184.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Goldberg A. (2009). Verbs, Constructions and Semantic Frames. In: Rappaport Hovav, M., E. Doron & I. Sichel (Ed.) Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure. Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A., & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions. Language Vol 80, No 3: 532-568
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, Mass., London, England: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language. New York, US.: Oxford University Press. Inc.
Jackendoff, R. (2008). Construction After Construction and its Theoretical Challenges. Language. Volume 84, No1.
Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. In: Rothstein, S. (Ed.). Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 197–235.
Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Matsumoto, Y. (1996). How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In: Goldberg, A. (Ed.) Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 359–373.
Matsumoto, Y. (2004). Constraints on the co-occurrence of spatial and non-spatial paths in English: a closer look at the Unique Path Constraint. Dostupno na http://www.lit.kobe-u.ac.jp/~yomatsum/papers/ICGC4.pdf
Milivojević, N. (2010a). Motion expression and framing in English and Serbian. U: Subotić, Lj. i I. Živančev-Sekeruš (ured.) Susret kultura, Peti međunrodni interdisciplinarni simpozijum. Zbornik radova, knjiga I. Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet. 625-633.
Milivojević, N. (2010b). Sintaksički subjekt kao teleološki agens uz glagole emitovanja zvuka u engleskom i srpskom jeziku. Godišnjak Filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, Vol. XXXV-2: 303-312.
Milivojević, N. (2011). Konstrukcioni idiomi sa glagolima emitovanja zvuka u engleskom i srpskom jeziku – generativna analiza. Doktorska disertacija. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet
Milivojević, N. (2016a). Revisiting verbs of emission: an update on some relevant theoretical accounts of lexical specification and argument structure of emission verbs. Logos&Littera: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches to text, 3, vol.1, 25–45.
Milivojević, N. (2016b). Konstrukcioni idiomi u engleskom i srpskom jeziku. Edicija E-disertacija, knjiga 10, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet http://www.ff.uns.ac.rs/biblioteka/biblioteka_digitalna_e-disertacija.html
Piper, P., Antonić, I., Ružić, V., Tanasić, S., Popović, Lj. & Tošović, B. (2005). Sintaksa savremenog srpskog jezika. Prosta rečenica (u redakciji Milke Ivić). Matica srpska, Beograd: Institut za srpski jezik SANU, Beogradska knjiga.
Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41: 47–81.
Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In: Shopen, T. (editor). Language Typology and Syntactic Description Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. New York: Cambridge University Press. 57–149.
Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume I: Concept Structuring System. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Talmy, L. (2000b). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review 66, 143–160.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A theory of aspectuality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zwarts, J. (2004). Event shape: Paths in the semantics of verbs. Workshop on the geometric structure of events, Konstanz, October 7–8
Zwarts, J. (2005). Prepositional Aspect and the Algebra of Paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28.6. 739–779.
Zwarts, J. (2006). Case marking directionality. Variation and Stability in Grammar, CASTL/CLS Workshop, Nijmegen, 25 April 2006.