DIMENSIONS OF THE TEACHERS’ ROLE IN HIGHER EDUCATION FROM THE STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE

Main Article Content

Borka D. Malčić
Nataša Tančić
Svetlana Kostović

Abstract

In modern society throughout the world, universities have become a part of industry, whose priorities are student satisfaction and competition for better ranking among variety of available faculties and student programmes in our country and abroad. In learning paradigm, teacher’s role has been changed. Teachers have become collaborators, partners and mentors in conceptualizing teaching activities mainly based on students as major actors, who express their subject position in teaching process through student evaluation of teaching.


The aim of this paper has been students’ evaluation of teaching performance in higher education, evaluation of teaching process in regard to gender differences of the respondents and evaluation of teaching process in correlation with academic achievement of the respondents.  


3rd year students (N=200), 53 of them male respondents at the Faculty of Philosophy in Novi Sad, enrolled at seven student programmes, have filled in a two part questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire refers to student gender, student programmes and previous-year student achievement data, while the second part consists of the Evaluation of Teaching Performance questionnaire (CEID, Moreno Murcia-Torregrosa&Belando Pedreno, 2015). The instrument items are grouped into 3 factors. The first one refers to the phase of planning, the second one to the phase of teaching process and the third one refers to the result phase of teaching process. The analysis data has been carried out in SPSS 22.0 programme package, and besides descriptive statistics, Sheffe’s test, T-test and Pearson Correlation have also been used.


The analysis data have shown that the questionnaire used for our respondents has had one factor. Student achievement does not significantly make a positive correlation with a perception of teaching quality performance. However, the data have shown statistically significant difference in student evaluation of teaching performance of university teachers in regard to student gender.  


Students’ evaluation is necessary, but not enough for a multidimensional construct in the evaluation of teaching performance in higher education. Although, student evaluation of teachers should have an important role in the evaluation of teaching performance, at the same time it should be only a part of teaching and teachers quality data. It’s obvious that an estimation of objective characteristics of teaching process has been filtered through their perceptual system and other factors involved. Therefore, the modern pedagogical evaluation concept, must also include various types of evaluation, while teacher self-evaluation must be its priority.


Key words: students, university, evaluation, teaching process, teacher’s role.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Malčić, B. D., Tančić, N., & Kostović, S. (2018). DIMENSIONS OF THE TEACHERS’ ROLE IN HIGHER EDUCATION FROM THE STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, 42(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2017.2.259-273
Section
Педагогија
Author Biographies

Borka D. Malčić, Filozofski fakultet

Filozofski fakultet
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu

Nataša Tančić, Filozofski fakultet

Filozofski fakultet
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu

Svetlana Kostović, Filozofski fakultet

Filozofski fakultet
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu

References

Apodaca, P., & Grad, H. (2005). The dimensionality of student ratings of teaching:
Integration of uni- and multidimensional models. Studies in Higher Education, 30,
723–748doi:10.1080/03075070500340101.

Benton, S. L., Duchon, D., & Pallett, W. H., (2011). Validity of student self-reported ratings of instruction. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.636799.

Berk, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 48-62.

Berk, R. A. (2013). Top five flashpoints in the assessment of teaching effectiveness. Medical Teacher, 35, 15-26.

Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of
teaching? The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 17–33.

Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A metaanalysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281–309. doi:10.3102/00346543051003281.

Đermanov, J. (2003). Promene u strukturi i funkcijama vrednovanja vaspitno-obrazovne delatnosti – od selektivne ka razvojnoj funkciji. Pedagoška stvarnost, 18, 32-43.

Đermanov, J. (2005). Inovativne forme evaluacije vaspitno-obrazovnog procesa u reformisanoj školi. U: Kamenov, E. (ured.) (2005). Reforma školskog sistema u uslovima tranzicije. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet. 57-67.

Đukić, M. (2002). Studentsko ocenjivanje nastave i nastavnika (pro et contra). Zbornik odseka za pedagogiju, 17, 21-30.

Đukić, M. (2002). Savremene reforme vrednovanja viskoškolske nastave. U: Kamenov, E. (ured.) (2002). Strategija razvoja sistema vaspitanja i obrazovanja u uslovima tranzicije. Rezultati komparativnih i prekseoloških proučavanja. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet. 223-246.

Đukić, M. (2006/2007). Konstruktivistička evaluacija nastave: didaktičke implikacije. Zbornik odseka za pedagogiju, 20/21, 107-118.

Đukić, M. (2010). Nova paradigma univerzitetske nastave kao izraz pedagoške reforme
visokog obrazovanja. Socioška luča IV/I, str. 135–145.

Feldman, K. A. (1976). The superior college teacher from the students’ view. Research in
Higher Education, 5(3), 243-288.

Feldman, K. A. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students and faculty views: matched or mismatched priorities? Research in Higher Education, 28 (4), 291-329.

Feldman, K. A. (2007). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The Scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 93-129). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Gursoy, D., & Umbreit, W. T. (2005). Exploring Students` Evaluations of Teaching Effectivness: What Factors are Important? Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 1 (29), 91-109. doi:10.1177/1096348004268197

Helgesen, Ø., & Nesset, E. (2007). What accounts for students’ loyalty? Some field
study evidence. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(2),
126–143.

Kostović, S. (2008). Pigmalion u razredu. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.

Jackson, D. L., Teal, C. R., Raines, S. J., & Nansel, T. R. (1999). The dimensions of students’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(4), 580-596.

Johnston, M., & Reid, D.J. (1999). Improving teaching in higher education, Educational Studies, 25(3), 269-281.

Kuzmanović, M.-Savić, G.-Gušavac, B.A.- Makajić-Nikolić, D., & Panić, B. (2013). A Conjoint-based approach to student evaluations of teaching perfor-mance. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 4083-4089. doi:10.1016/j.esw.2013.01.039

Lukas, J. F.-Santiago, K.-Etxeberria, J., & Lizasoain, L. (2014). Adapting to the European Higher Education Area a questionnaire on student opinion about the teaching of lecturers. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Edu-cativa, 20(1). doi:10.7203/relieve.20.1.3812

Malešević, D., Adamović, Z., & Đurić, Z. (2011). The influence of competences of a
teacher on the quality of professional education. Technics Technologies Education
Management-TTEM, 6(4), 1100–1109.

Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidencebased perspective (pp. 319–384). New York, NY: Springer.

Moreno-Murcia, J.A.-Torregrosa, Y.S., & Belando Pedreno, N. (2015). Questionnaire evaluating teaching competencies in the university environment. Evaluation of teaching competencies in the university. New approaches in Educational research, 4(1), 54-61.

OECD (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective
teachers. Paris: OECD.

Rubie-Davis, C. M. (2007). Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of highand low-expectation teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77,
289–306.

Spooren, P. (2010). On the credibility of the judge. A cross-classified multilevel analysis on students` evaluation of teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36, 121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.02.001.

Spooren, P., & Mortelmans, D. (2006). Teacher professionalism and student evaluation of teaching: Will better teachers receive higher ratings and will better students give higher ratings? Educational Studies, 32, 201–214. doi:10.1080/03055690600631101.

Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief
review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 191–210doi:10.1080/
0260293980230207.